Behavioural finance is a relatively new field of study that combines the principles of psychology with traditional finance to explain how and why people make financial decisions. The field seeks to identify and explain the cognitive and emotional biases that influence investor behaviour, often leading to irrational financial decisions.
Traditional finance assumes that investors are rational and always act in their best interests. However, behavioural finance research has shown that this is not always the case. Investors are often influenced by emotions and biases, which can lead to suboptimal decision-making. Behavioural finance aims to identify these biases and understand how they affect financial decisions.
History of Behavioural Finance:
Behavioural finance emerged in the late 1970s and early 1980s as psychologists and economists began to question the rationality assumptions of traditional finance. The pioneers of the field include Amos Tversky and Daniel Kahneman, who proposed the prospect theory in 1979. The prospect theory explains how people evaluate and make decisions under uncertainty, and it challenges the rational choice theory that underpins traditional finance.
In the decades since, behavioural finance has become an increasingly popular field of study, with researchers exploring various biases and heuristics that influence financial decisions. Some of the most significant contributors to the field include Richard Thaler, who won the Nobel Prize in Economics in 2017 for his contributions to behavioural economics, and Robert Shiller, who won the Nobel Prize in Economics in 2013 for his work on asset pricing and financial bubbles.
Concepts in Behavioural Finance:
- Loss Aversion:
Loss aversion is the tendency to feel more pain from a loss than pleasure from a gain. This can lead to investors holding on to losing investments longer than they should, in the hope of recovering their losses. Loss aversion can also lead to risk aversion, where investors are willing to accept lower returns to avoid losses.
- Confirmation Bias:
Confirmation bias is the tendency to seek out information that confirms our existing beliefs and to ignore information that contradicts them. This can lead investors to make decisions based on incomplete or biased information.
- Overconfidence Bias:
Overconfidence bias is the tendency to overestimate one’s abilities and knowledge. This can lead to overconfidence in investment decisions, leading investors to take on too much risk or make unwise investment choices.
- Herding Behaviour:
Herding behaviour is the tendency to follow the crowd and make decisions based on the actions of others. This can lead to market bubbles and crashes, as investors pile into or out of investments based on the actions of others.
- Anchoring Bias:
Anchoring bias is the tendency to rely too heavily on the first piece of information received when making decisions. This can lead investors to make decisions based on outdated or irrelevant information.
- Availability Bias:
Availability bias is the tendency to make decisions based on readily available information, rather than more comprehensive data. This can lead investors to make decisions based on incomplete or misleading information.
Applications of Behavioural Finance:
- Portfolio Management:
Behavioural finance can be used to design investment strategies that account for the biases and heuristics that influence investor behaviour. For example, a portfolio manager may design a portfolio that incorporates diversification and risk management to help mitigate the effects of loss aversion.
- Financial Planning:
Financial planners can use behavioural finance to help clients make better financial decisions by understanding their biases and heuristics. For example, a financial planner may help a client develop a long-term investment plan that accounts for their tendency towards loss aversion.
- Market Analysis:
Behavioural finance can help analysts understand market trends and predict market behaviour by identifying the biases and heuristics that influence investor behaviour. For example, an analyst may use behavioural finance to identify market bubbles or crashes based on herding behaviour or overconfidence bias.
- Risk Management:
Behavioural finance can help identify and mitigate the risks associated with financial decision-making. For example, a risk manager may use behavioural finance to identify areas of the market where investors are susceptible to herding behaviour or overconfidence bias and take steps to manage those risks.
- Investment Education:
Behavioural finance can help investors become more aware of their biases and heuristics and make better financial decisions. For example, investment education programs may incorporate behavioural finance principles to help individuals better understand their decision-making processes and how to overcome their biases.
- Corporate Finance:
Behavioural finance can help corporations make better financial decisions by understanding how their own biases and heuristics influence decision-making. For example, a company may use behavioural finance to design compensation structures that incentivize executives to make decisions that are aligned with the company’s long-term goals.
Criticism of Behavioural Finance:
-
Lack of Unified Theory
One major criticism of behavioural finance is that it lacks a unified, comprehensive theory like traditional finance. While classical finance relies on models like Efficient Market Hypothesis (EMH) and Modern Portfolio Theory (MPT), behavioural finance consists mostly of fragmented insights and isolated biases. This makes it difficult to systematically apply its principles to real-world investing. Without a cohesive structure, it’s challenging for behavioural finance to offer predictive power or serve as a foundation for consistent decision-making across different financial environments.
-
Overemphasis on Irrationality
Behavioural finance often portrays investors as predominantly irrational, frequently ignoring instances where they behave logically or learn from experience. This overemphasis may distort the true nature of market behaviour. Critics argue that by focusing mainly on errors and anomalies, behavioural finance underestimates human adaptability and rational responses over time. Such an unbalanced view may limit its application in practical investment strategies, where both rational and irrational behaviours coexist and influence market outcomes.
-
Difficult to Quantify Biases
Another issue is the difficulty of accurately measuring and quantifying behavioural biases. Psychological traits like overconfidence, anchoring, or loss aversion vary widely between individuals and across time. Unlike traditional financial variables like interest rates or stock prices, behavioural tendencies are not easily expressed in numerical terms. This limits the practical utility of behavioural models in forecasting or building quantitative investment frameworks, making them less robust for implementation in algorithmic or data-driven investment strategies.
-
Retrospective Explanation
Behavioural finance is often accused of being more descriptive than predictive. Many of its theories are used to explain market events after they occur, rather than forecasting them in advance. For instance, biases like herding or panic are invoked to explain financial crashes—but rarely predicted beforehand. This reactive nature limits behavioural finance’s ability to offer actionable insights or risk management tools. Traditional finance, in contrast, emphasizes forward-looking models with clear predictive capabilities.
-
Neglect of Institutional and Structural Factors
Behavioural finance mainly focuses on individual investor psychology and often ignores broader institutional, political, or structural influences on financial markets. Factors like central bank policy, market regulation, or technological disruptions can significantly impact investment decisions but are often left out of behavioural analyses. This narrow focus reduces its usefulness for understanding complex market phenomena influenced by a blend of psychology and macroeconomic factors, and risks providing an incomplete picture of financial reality.
-
Limited Practical Application
Despite its academic appeal, behavioural finance has limited direct application in portfolio management or financial advisory practices. Many fund managers still rely heavily on traditional valuation models and risk assessments. While behavioural insights can be useful in understanding investor sentiment or designing nudges, they are rarely used as core investment strategies. Moreover, incorporating behavioural elements into financial planning or algorithmic models remains a challenge due to their subjective and variable nature.