The term ‘working capital management’ primarily refers to the efforts of the management towards effective management of current assets and current liabilities. Working capital is nothing but the difference between the current assets and current liabilities. In other words, an efficient working capital management means ensuring sufficient liquidity in the business to be able to satisfy short-term expenses and debts.
In a broader view, ‘working capital management’ includes working capital financing apart from managing the current assets and liabilities. That adds the responsibility for arranging the working capital at the lowest possible cost and utilizing the capital cost-effectively.
Objectives of Working Capital Management
The primary objectives of working capital management include the following:
Smooth Operating Cycle: The key objective of working capital management is to ensure a smooth operating cycle. It means the cycle should never stop for the lack of liquidity whether it is for buying raw material, salaries, tax payments etc.
Lowest Working Capital: For achieving the smooth operating cycle, it is also important to keep the requirement of working capital at the lowest. This may be achieved by favorable credit terms with accounts payable and receivables both, faster production cycle, effective inventory management etc.
Minimize Rate of Interest or Cost of Capital: It is important to understand that the interest cost of capital is one of the major costs in any firm. The management of the firm should negotiate well with the financial institutions, select the right mode of finance, maintain optimal capital structure etc.
Optimal Return on Current Asset Investment: In many businesses, you have a liquidity crunch at one point of time and excess liquidity at another. This happens mostly with seasonal industries. At the time of excess liquidity, the management should have good short-term investment avenues to take benefit of the idle funds.
For a detailed understanding, you may consider referring, Objectives of Working Capital Management.
Importance Of Effective Working Capital Management
Although the importance of working capital is unquestionable in any type of business. Working capital management is a day to day activity, unlike capital budgeting decisions. Most importantly, inefficiencies at any levels of management have an impact on the working capital and its management. Following are the main points that signify why it is important to take the management of working capital seriously.
- Ensures Higher Return on Capital
- Improvement in Credit Profile & Solvency
- Increased Profitability
- Better Liquidity
- Business Value Appreciation
- Most Suitable Financing Terms
- Interruption Free Production
- Readiness for Shocks and Peak Demand
- Advantage over Competitors
Decisions in Working Capital Management
If anybody describes the benefits of working capital management in terms of money, it would most likely be the cost of capital that a business pays on the investment in working capital. The amount of this cost would depend on two things viz. the quantum of working capital requiredand the cost of working capital. The quantum of working capital is decided by the working capital policies of a company whereas the optimization of the cost of capital is worked out with working capital management strategies.
WORKING CAPITAL DECIDING FACTORS – LEVEL AND MODE OF FINANCING
The two main factors that decide the quantum of working capital that a business should maintain, are liquidity and profitability. Let’s understand the impact of both of these factors in details.
Nobody denies the importance of liquidity but most have a question that how much that liquidity should be? What are the right levels of liquidity? We know that a business can’t sit on unlimited or too high liquidity because higher liquidity means higher investment in working capital. And higher investment in working capital means higher cost of capital, interest cost in case financed by bank finance. Therefore, the higher liquidity has a direct impact on the profitability as the capital cost rises. In essence, the relation between liquidity and profitability is inverse. On one hand, higher rather sufficient liquidity is the primary goal of working capital management. Whereas on the other hand, profitability as an objective aligns with the overall objective of an organization i.e. wealth maximization.
With that, it is quite clear that a policy that an organization follows would fall between these pillars. There may be policies that are tilted towards liquidity and others may be towards profitability. It is then a management decision where do they want to place their organization’s policy.
Working Capital Management Policies
Working capital management policies deal with the quantum factor i.e. how much of current assets should be maintained? These policies, in essence, are different levels of the tradeoff between liquidity and profitability. Theoretically, following three types of policies are explained whereas they can be n number of policies depending on where the tradeoff is stricken between the liquidity and profitability.
- Relaxed Policy / Conservative policy: This policy has a high level of current assets maintained to honor the current liabilities. Here, the liquidity is very high and the direct impact on profitability is also high.
- Restricted Policy / Aggressive policy: This policy a lower level of current assets. Here, the liquidity levels are very low, therefore, the direct impact on profitability is also low.
- Moderate Policy– It lies between the conservative and aggressive policy.
WORKING CAPITAL MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES
Working capital management strategies deal with the cost of capital factor. The question is – How the costs of capital are optimized? A business has a choice to select between short-term vs. long-term sources of capital. Normally, the short term funds are cheaper to long-term but risky. Short term funds are risky in terms of risk of refinancing and risk of rising interest rates. Once they mature, they may not be refinanced by the same financial institution and there is a possibility of revision in interest rate every time they are renewed.
Let’s divide a firm’s capital investment into two i.e. investment in fixed assets and investment in working capital. Let’s safely assume that long-term funds finance the fixed assets. Now remaining is working capital. Let us further divide working capital into two i.e. permanent and temporary working capital. The nature of permanent working capital is similar to fixed assets i.e. that level of investment in working is always present and remaining part keeps fluctuating. The working capital management strategies define how these two types of working capital are financed.
- Hedging (Maturity Matching) Strategy: This strategy follows the principal of finance i.e. long-term funds to finance long-term assets and vice versa. In this strategy, the maturities of currents are matched with the maturity of its financing instrument. It does not have any cushion or flexibility in case of any delay in the realization of current assets. Although it is a very ideal strategy but involves a high risk of bankruptcy.
- Conservative: Its a safer strategy where the apart from financing the whole of the permanent working capital, it finances a part of temporary working capital also.
- Aggressive: It’s a high-risk strategy where the apart from financing the whole of the temporary working capital, it finances a part of permanent working capital also.
For a detailed and in-depth understanding, you may refer, Working Capital Management Strategies / Approaches.
Advantages of Working Capital Management
- Working capital management ensures sufficient liquidity when required.
- It evades interruptions in operations.
- Profitability maximized.
- Achieves better financial health.
- Develops competitive advantage due to streamlined operations.
Disadvantages of Working Capital Management
- It only considers monetary factors. There are non-monetary factors that it ignores like customer and employee satisfaction, government policy, market trend etc.
- Difficult to accommodate sudden economic changes.
- Too high dependence on data is another downside. A smaller organization may not have such data generation.
- Too many variables to keep in mind say current ratios, quick ratios, collection periods, etc.