Government Systems for Redressal, Judiciary, Human Rights Commission and other Statutory Commissions

Government systems for redressal, including the judiciary, human rights commissions, and other statutory commissions, play a crucial role in upholding the rule of law, protecting human rights, and providing mechanisms for justice and accountability. These institutions form an integral part of democratic governance, ensuring the enforcement of laws, addressing grievances, and safeguarding the rights and freedoms of individuals.


The judiciary is an independent branch of government responsible for interpreting and applying laws, adjudicating disputes, and ensuring access to justice. It serves as a critical check and balance in democratic systems and plays a vital role in protecting human rights. The judiciary typically consists of different levels, including trial courts, appellate courts, and supreme or constitutional courts. Some key aspects of the judiciary include:

  1. Structure: The judiciary is composed of judges appointed based on merit and independence. The hierarchical structure ensures that cases can be appealed to higher courts for review.
  2. Functions: The judiciary has several functions, including interpreting legislation, resolving disputes, protecting individual rights, and reviewing the constitutionality of laws and government actions.
  3. Independence: Judicial independence is essential to ensure impartiality and prevent undue influence or interference from other branches of government or external actors. This independence allows judges to make decisions based on the law and principles of justice.
  4. Adversarial System: Many judicial systems follow an adversarial model where opposing parties present their cases, and the judge impartially adjudicates based on evidence and legal arguments.
  5. Judicial Review: Judicial review is the power of courts to review the constitutionality of laws and government actions. It allows the judiciary to strike down laws or executive actions that violate constitutional rights.

Human Rights Commissions:

Human rights commissions are statutory bodies established by governments to promote and protect human rights within a country. These commissions typically have a mandate to investigate human rights violations, provide remedies for victims, raise awareness, and make recommendations for policy changes. Some key aspects of human rights commissions include:

  1. Structure: Human rights commissions consist of members appointed by the government or through an independent selection process. They may include representatives from diverse backgrounds, including human rights experts, civil society members, and legal professionals.
  2. Functions: Human rights commissions investigate complaints of human rights violations, conduct inquiries, monitor the human rights situation, promote awareness, and advocate for policy changes to protect human rights.
  3. Independence: Ensuring the independence of human rights commissions is crucial to their effectiveness. They should have the power to operate autonomously, free from undue influence from the government or other entities.
  4. Remedial Measures: Human rights commissions have the authority to recommend remedial measures for victims of human rights abuses, including compensation, rehabilitation, and legal redress.
  5. Advocacy and Awareness: Human rights commissions play a vital role in raising awareness about human rights issues, conducting educational programs, and promoting a culture of respect for human rights within society.

Statutory Commissions:

Statutory commissions are bodies established by law to address specific areas of concern, such as women’s rights, children’s rights, minority rights, and more. These commissions are responsible for monitoring and protecting the rights of specific groups and promoting equality and non-discrimination. Some key types of statutory commissions include:

  1. Women’s Commissions: Women’s commissions are dedicated to promoting and safeguarding women’s rights, addressing gender-based discrimination, and advocating for gender equality. They work to address issues such as violence against women, gender-based discrimination, and equal opportunities.
  2. Children’s Commissions: Children’s commissions focus on protecting and promoting the rights of children, ensuring their well-being, and safeguarding them from abuse, exploitation, and neglect. They work towards the implementation of child rights laws, investigate complaints of child rights violations, and advocate for policies and programs that benefit children.
  3. Minority Commissions: Minority commissions are established to protect the rights and interests of minority communities, such as religious, ethnic, or linguistic minorities. They aim to prevent discrimination, promote equal opportunities, and address issues specific to minority communities.
  4. Disability Commissions: Disability commissions focus on safeguarding the rights of persons with disabilities, ensuring their inclusion, accessibility, and non-discrimination. They work towards the implementation of disability rights legislation, advocate for accessible infrastructure and services, and address issues related to disability discrimination.
  5. Human Rights Commissions: Apart from the national human rights commissions mentioned earlier, many countries have established regional or local human rights commissions at the state or provincial level. These commissions have a similar mandate to protect and promote human rights but operate within a specific jurisdiction.

Functions and Powers of Redressal Mechanisms:

Government systems for redressal, including the judiciary, human rights commissions, and statutory commissions, have various functions and powers to fulfill their mandates. Some of these functions and powers include:

  1. Complaint Handling and Investigation: These mechanisms receive complaints from individuals or groups regarding human rights violations, administrative actions, or legal disputes. They have the authority to investigate complaints, gather evidence, and seek remedies for victims.
  2. Mediation and Conciliation: Redressal mechanisms often employ mediation and conciliation methods to facilitate the resolution of disputes and conflicts. This approach promotes dialogue, negotiation, and mutually agreed-upon solutions, avoiding lengthy litigation processes.
  3. Adjudication and Remedies: The judiciary has the power to adjudicate disputes, apply relevant laws, and deliver judgments or rulings. They can provide remedies, such as compensation, injunctions, or orders for specific actions, to address the harm caused by human rights violations.
  4. Monitoring and Reporting: Human rights commissions and statutory commissions play a crucial role in monitoring the human rights situation, conducting inquiries, and publishing reports on their findings. These reports can raise awareness, identify systemic issues, and recommend policy changes to address human rights challenges.
  5. Public Advocacy and Awareness: Redressal mechanisms engage in public advocacy, awareness campaigns, and educational initiatives to promote human rights, raise awareness about legal protections, and foster a culture of respect for human rights within society.
  6. Policy Recommendations: These mechanisms have the authority to make recommendations to the government for policy changes, legislative reforms, and administrative improvements to protect human rights, promote equality, and address systemic issues.

Challenges and Way Forward:

While government systems for redressal play a crucial role in upholding human rights and ensuring justice, they also face various challenges. These challenges include:

  1. Backlogs and Delays: Overburdened judicial systems often face backlogs of cases, leading to significant delays in the resolution of disputes. This can hinder access to justice and impede the timely redressal of human rights violations.
  2. Capacity Building: Redressal mechanisms require adequate resources, infrastructure, and skilled personnel to effectively carry out their functions. Insufficient resources and capacity can impact the efficiency and effectiveness of these mechanisms.
  3. Independence and Impartiality: Ensuring the independence and impartiality of redressal mechanisms is crucial for building public trust and confidence. Any perception of bias or political interference can undermine their credibility and effectiveness.
  4. Awareness and Access: Many individuals, especially marginalized and vulnerable groups, may face barriers in accessing redressal mechanisms due to lack of awareness, language barriers, or limited resources. Efforts should be made to enhance awareness and improve accessibility to these mechanisms.
  5. Implementation of Recommendations: The implementation of recommendations made by redressal mechanisms can be challenging.

Leave a Reply

error: Content is protected !!
%d bloggers like this: